--- title: "Seamless.AI alternatives, by reason for leaving" description: "Seamless.AI alternatives ranked by why teams actually switch, with verified pricing and the trade each one makes." url: https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/alternatives/seamless-ai-alternatives updated: 2026-11-12 --- Alternatives · Verified 24 Oct 2026 # Seamless.AI alternatives, sorted by *why you are leaving* Seamless.AI charges you to find a contact and again to unlock it, at a price it will only tell you on a call. 4 replacements below, each one matched to a specific reason. Short answer Most teams leaving Seamless.AI want a price they can read and a bill that moves only when a contact is found. LeadMagic is the closest fit on both counts: credits come off only on a valid result, search is free in the app, and $99 buys 5,000 of them. Apollo and Lusha are the two to start with if you want to test the API for nothing first, and RocketReach is the one with published rate limits and a per-export price that falls with volume. Keep Seamless.AI if its engagement tools and its 57-tool MCP server are doing work your team would otherwise rebuild. Prices and limits for every option below are read off the vendor's own page. These are the Seamless.AI competitors that each answer a named problem. See the 4 alternatives [Visit Seamless.AI](https://seamless.ai/) replacements.txt 4 picks leadmagic **$99/mo** apollo **$49/seat/mo** lusha **$37.45/mo annual** rocketreach **$33/mo annual** Currently on Quote only Diagnose first ## The 3 reasons people actually leave If none of these is your situation, the honest answer is that you should probably stay. The 23 providers in the [Enrichment APIs](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis) listing are where these replacements come from. ### 1 · No published price at any tier The Seamless.AI pricing page is a form asking how many contacts you need a month. The help center does publish the allowances, 250 Universal Credits a user a month on Basic and 10,000 on Pro, but not what either costs. Teams comparing Seamless.AI competitors usually start here, because a credit with no price cannot be compared with anything. ### 2 · Search and research are billed separately A search costs 1 credit for every 10 rows it returns, and the rows are previews without emails or phones. Researching a row to unlock its contact data is another credit, and Seamless says plainly that search does not start research. Finding and unlocking 100 contacts is about 110 credits, before any that come back without what you wanted. ### 3 · The API is a separate license, and the limit is shared The REST API needs an organization-level Public API license; without one every call returns 422 missingLicense. The default limit is 60 requests a minute per endpoint, shared by every key and user in the organization. The free license gives 50 credits that never replenish, so it will not keep a test environment alive. The alternatives ## 4 Seamless.AI alternatives, and what each one fixes Ordered by how closely each one answers the reasons above, not by price. | Provider | Entry price | Unit cost | Free tier | Best for | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [Seamless.AI](https://seamless.ai/) | Quote only | Not sold by the unit | Free license with 50 Universal Credits that never replenish. The API needs a Public API license, which Seamless's API page says is bundled with some plans or sold as an add-on. | Baseline | | [LeadMagic](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/leadmagic-api-review) | $99/mo | $0.0198 per credit | No free tier. Essential starts at $99 for 5,000 credits, and failed lookups cost nothing. | Best priced per operation | | [Apollo API](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/apollo-api-review) | $49/seat/mo | $0.0196 per credit | Free plan with API access, 900 credits per seat per year granted monthly, so 75 a month | Best all-in-one GTM API | | [Lusha](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/lusha-api-review) | $37.45/mo annual | $0.087 per credit | Free plan, 40 credits a month, 1 seat, no card. API is rate limited strictly. | Best published credit costs for contact data | | [RocketReach](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/rocketreach-api-review) | $33/mo annual | $0.25 per export on Pro, the first plan with phones | A free account gets 5 lookups, no card. No ongoing free tier. | API and MCP on the cheapest paid tier | Read from each vendor's own pricing page on 24 October 2026. In detail ## The case for each one Each one below is matched to a reason rather than scored, and each one names what you give up by taking it. A replacement with no downside is a replacement nobody has actually run. ### LeadMagic Credits come off only on a valid result, and search is free in the app, the opposite of paying for the search and then the unlock. [LeadMagic](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/leadmagic-api-review) publishes the credit cost of every operation: an email finder 1 credit, a mobile 5, a validation 0.25 and a job change 3. Credits are deducted on valid results only, never on a miss, and search is free in the app on every plan, while the Search API costs a credit a result on Essential and Growth and nothing from Professional. On Seamless.AI the search is a charge and the unlock is a second one. The plans are printed. Essential is $99 a month for 5,000 credits, $0.0198 each; Growth is $249 for 20,000, $0.0124; Professional is 50,000 credits a month at $0.0100, with a published floor of $0.007 a credit at volume. Annual billing lowers each rate again, Essential carries one table seat, and on monthly plans unused credits carry over up to twice the monthly allotment. A hosted [MCP server](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/mcp-servers) comes with every plan, the key goes in the X-API-Key header, and the throughput is written down: 600 requests a minute on Email Finder and Validation, the same on every plan. Every number a Seamless.AI evaluation has to ask for is on LeadMagic's pages. #### What you give up A free tier and the wider data. LeadMagic has no free allowance, so you pay $99 before measuring a match rate, and it carries no intent or technographic data, both of which Seamless.AI sells. #### When it is the wrong answer A team that buys Seamless.AI for buyer intent and technology filters rather than for contact data. [Read the review](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/leadmagic-api-review) ### [Visit Apollo](https://go.frontal.so/apollo) Apollo API A published price, a free plan with full API access, and search, enrichment and sequencing behind one key. [Apollo](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/apollo-api-review) prints what Seamless.AI quotes. Basic is $49 a seat a month billed annually for 30,000 credits a seat a year, 2,500 a month at $0.0196 each, and an email is 1 credit. The free plan carries full API access rather than a trial, at 900 credits a seat a year granted as 75 a month. The integration is documented to the number: the key in the x-api-key header, 200 requests a minute, 400 an hour and 2,000 a day on Basic, enrichment at 1,000 a minute with no hourly or daily cap. Apollo also runs an MCP server at mcp.apollo.io/mcp, so an agent integration is a configuration line on both sides of this comparison. Apollo covers the same span Seamless.AI does, from people search to sending. Its sequence, contact and task endpoints cost 0 credits, which is the engagement half that Seamless.AI gates behind its Connect license. #### What you give up Seat-free pricing and the cheap phone. Credits are granted per seat per year, Organization needs three seats at $357 a month, and a mobile that comes back costs 9 credits, $0.1764. #### When it is the wrong answer A headless pipeline with nobody logged in, which still pays a seat price to get credits. [Read the review](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/apollo-api-review) · [Seamless.AI vs Apollo](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/compare/apollo-vs-seamless-ai) ### Lusha A free plan that includes the API and a rate card that prices each field, so you know the cost of a lookup before you make it. [Lusha](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/lusha-api-review)'s free plan is 40 credits a month on one seat, no card, with API access Lusha describes as strictly rate limited. Seamless.AI's free license gives 50 credits once, and the API needs a separate license on top. On Lusha the measuring instrument is free and stays free. An email is 1 credit, a phone number 5 and a recorded call 8, at $0.087 a credit on Pro, $52.45 a month billed yearly for 600 credits a month with full API access and webhooks. The per-credit rate is flat from Starter at $37.45 to Premium at $299.95, so the cost of every lookup is printed before you run it. The key is issued in the dashboard and sent in the api\_key header, and Lusha runs an MCP server. Pro credits roll over up to twice the monthly cap, which Seamless.AI's monthly refresh on the contract date does not offer. #### What you give up Published throughput and the cheap phone. Seamless.AI publishes 60 requests a minute per endpoint; Lusha meters per plan across minute, hour and day windows and publishes none of the numbers, and a direct dial is $0.437. #### When it is the wrong answer High-volume phone work, where both the phone rate and the unpublished limits count against it. [Read the review](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/lusha-api-review) ### RocketReach The API and an MCP server from the $33 plan, rate limits published per plan, and a per-export price that falls with volume. [RocketReach](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/rocketreach-api-review) puts the API and the MCP server on every paid plan, including Essentials at $33 a month billed annually, which is email only. There is no separate API license and no quote. The key comes from Account Settings and the MCP server signs in with OAuth 2.1 and PKCE. The price per export genuinely falls with volume: $0.33 on Essentials, $0.25 on Pro at $899 a year for 3,600 exports with email and phone, and $0.085 on Ultimate at $1,699 for 20,000. One export unlocks the contact, so there is no separate charge for the search that found it. The rate limits are written down: 15 person lookups a minute and 500 a day on Essentials, up to 100 a minute and 3,000 a day on Ultimate, under 10 requests a second. That is the planning number Seamless.AI gives only as a default you may need to raise with sales. #### What you give up Monthly billing and the engagement half. RocketReach exports are annual allowances, Essentials is email only, there is no ongoing free tier beyond 5 lookups, and there are no campaign or email tools. #### When it is the wrong answer A team that uses Seamless.AI for outreach as well as data, which RocketReach does not do. [Read the review](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/rocketreach-api-review) Plan by plan ## What you would actually pay, on each one Every provider on this page publishes a rate card, so the real numbers can sit next to each other rather than behind a summary. The plan you want is the one whose included volume covers a normal month for you, not the cheapest one on the page. ### Seamless.AI Seamless.AI publishes 4 tiers, one of them free, and every paid tier is quoted rather than priced. #### Free $0 50 credits, once - 50 Universal Credits that do not replenish - API needs a Public API license #### Basic Quote per user - 250 Universal Credits a user a month - Credits refresh on the contract date #### Pro Quote per user - 10,000 Universal Credits a user a month - Credits refresh on the contract date #### Bulk credits Quote one organization pool - A fixed pool shared by the organization - Does not replenish; top up by buying more ### LeadMagic LeadMagic publishes 5 tiers, one of them free, and the paid ladder runs from $99 to $849. #### Essential $99 /mo, 5,000 credits - $83/mo billed annually, $990 a year, saving $198 - $0.0198 a credit, or $0.0165 on the annual 60,000 - 1 table seat; team access is by request from $499 - Unused credits carry over up to twice the monthly allotment #### Growth $249 /mo, 20,000 credits - $208/mo billed annually - $0.0124 a credit, or $0.0104 on the annual 240,000 - 1 table seat, one shared pool #### Professional $499 /mo, 50,000 credits - $416/mo billed annually - $0.0100 a credit, or $0.0083 on the annual 600,000 - Unmetered Search API at 5 requests a second - 2 table seats #### Ultimate $849 /mo, 100,000 credits - $708/mo billed annually - $0.0085 a credit, or $0.0071 on the annual 1.2 million - Unmetered Search API at 10 requests a second - 3 table seats #### Free tier None no free allowance - No way to measure your own match rate before paying - The clearest gap in an otherwise clear rate card ### [Visit Apollo](https://go.frontal.so/apollo) Apollo API Apollo publishes 4 tiers, one of them free, and the paid ladder runs from $49 to $119. #### Free $0 900 credits a seat a year - Full API access, not a trial of it - Granted monthly, so 75 credits a month in practice - 2 sequences and basic filters #### Basic $49 /seat/mo billed annually, 30,000 credits a seat a year - $588 a seat a year, credits granted upfront and pooled across the team - 2,500 credits a month, at $0.0196 each - Annual billing saves 24% against paying monthly #### Professional $79 /seat/mo billed annually, 48,000 credits a seat a year - 4,000 credits a month, at $0.0198 each - AI lead scoring and multi-touch outreach #### Organization $119 /seat/mo billed annually, minimum 3 seats - 72,000 credits a seat a year, so 6,000 a month - $0.0198 a credit, so the rate is flat across every paid tier - The three-seat minimum makes $357 a month the real floor ### Lusha Lusha publishes 5 tiers, one of them free, and the paid ladder runs from $37.45 to $299.95, with a quoted tier above it. #### Free $0 /month - 40 credits a month, 1 seat - No credit card required - API access, but strictly rate limited #### Starter $37.45 /mo billed yearly - 4,800 credits a year, granted up front - 1 seat. Works out at $0.094 a credit - API still strictly rate limited #### Pro $52.45 /mo billed yearly - 7,200 credits a year, at $0.087 each - 2 free seats, full API, webhooks, CSV enrichment - Credits roll over to twice the monthly cap #### Premium $299.95 /mo billed yearly - 40,800 credits a year, at $0.088 each - 5 free seats, API Advanced, team management - Credit allocation across the team #### Scale Quote only - Custom annual credit volume - SSO and a dedicated customer success team - No rollover: the cap does not apply ### RocketReach RocketReach publishes 3 tiers, none of them free, and the paid ladder runs from $33 to $141.58. #### Essentials $33 /mo billed annually, $399 a year - 1,200 exports a year, email only - Unlimited verified personal and professional emails - MCP and API access #### Pro $75 /mo billed annually, $899 a year - 3,600 exports a year, email and phone - Technographics, news and org charts - Salesforce, Outreach, HubSpot and Salesloft integrations #### Ultimate $141.58 /mo billed annually, $1,699 a year - 20,000 exports a year, email and phone - Intent data and healthcare data - Salesforce custom mapping Read the included volume before the headline price. A plan that costs twice as much and carries five times the credits is the cheaper plan, and on this page that is the usual case rather than the exception. Cost model ## What each one costs at your volume Seamless.AI first, then every replacement. The model picks the cheapest published plan that covers your volume on each one, which is the comparison a row of entry prices cannot make. ### Seamless.AI Publishes no price, so there is nothing here to model and the lines below say what to ask for. Published price **None** Monthly **Quoted** Twelve months **Quoted** Ask for **the per-unit rate at your volume and the annual minimum** ### LeadMagic Priced on the volume you use, so the plan that covers a normal month is the one that decides the bill. Plan that covers it **Growth** Monthly **$249** Twelve months **$2,988** Included **20,000 credits** Your rate at this volume **$0.0249 per credit** ### [Visit Apollo](https://go.frontal.so/apollo) Apollo API Priced on the volume you use, so the plan that covers a normal month is the one that decides the bill. Plan that covers it **Basic, 4 seats** Monthly **$196** Twelve months **$2,352** Included **10,000 credits** Your rate at this volume **$0.0196 per credit** ### Lusha Priced on the volume you use, so the plan that covers a normal month is the one that decides the bill. Plan that covers it **Past the published ladder** Largest published **Premium, 3,400 credits** At your volume **Quoted** Ask for **the per-credit rate above 3,400** ### RocketReach Priced on the volume you use, so the plan that covers a normal month is the one that decides the bill. Plan that covers it **Past the published ladder** Largest published **Ultimate, 1,667 exports** At your volume **Quoted** Ask for **the per-export rate above 1,667** Plans are read from each vendor's own pricing page and the model picks the cheapest one that covers you, so these are list prices on the billing term each vendor publishes, annual where that is how it prices, before any discount you negotiate. Seamless.AI publishes no price, so nothing is modeled there and the panel says what to ask for instead. Twelve months ## What a year costs at three volumes The same plan-fit arithmetic as the model above, run out to a year, because an annual number is what a budget actually asks for. The priced columns move with volume, through a bigger plan or more seats. | A year at | Seamless.AI | LeadMagic | Apollo API | Lusha | RocketReach | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1,000 a month | Quoted | $1,188 Essential | $588 Basic | $3,599 Premium | $1,699 Ultimate | | 10,000 a month | Quoted | $2,988 Growth | $2,352 Basic | Quoted | Quoted | | 50,000 a month | Quoted | $5,988 Professional | $11,760 Basic | Quoted | Quoted | Seamless.AI does not publish enough to price a year, so that column is marked rather than filled. These are list prices on the published plan that covers each volume, on the billing term each vendor publishes, so they are the number before you negotiate. Provenance ## Where the data comes from, and what you may do with it The question that arrives late and expensively is who is allowed to hold the data. A migration is the moment to check it, because you are signing a new contract anyway. | Provider | Fields returned | Coverage | Compliance | Redistribution | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [Seamless.AI](https://seamless.ai/) | Work email, Mobile phone, Firmographics, Technographics, Intent and news, Job changes, LinkedIn profile | Global | SOC 2 Type II | Not stated | | [LeadMagic](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/leadmagic-api-review) | Work email, Mobile phone, Firmographics, Job postings, Job changes, LinkedIn profile | Global | GDPR DPA | Not stated | | [Apollo API](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/apollo-api-review) | Work email, Mobile phone, Firmographics, Technographics, Job postings, Intent and news, LinkedIn profile, CRM records | Global | GDPR DPA SOC 2 Type II CCPA | Not stated | | [Lusha](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/lusha-api-review) | Work email, Mobile phone, Firmographics, Technographics, Intent and news, Job changes | Global | GDPR DPA CCPA | Not stated | | [RocketReach](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/rocketreach-api-review) | Work email, Personal email, Mobile phone, Firmographics, Technographics, Intent and news | Strongest in NA | CCPA | Not stated | None of these states a redistribution position on its pricing or docs pages. Internally that never matters. Put the rows in something your customers can see and it becomes the question your legal team asks first. Two practical notes that apply to every provider on this page. A compliance badge describes the vendor rather than your use of it, so a GDPR DPA does not give you a lawful basis for the outreach you send. And every one of these vendors runs its own opt-out, which means a person who asks you to delete their record has to be removed from your copy as well as from theirs. Migration ## Moving off Seamless.AI Written against LeadMagic, the first pick above, because the steps are the same whichever one you take and the specifics are what make them useful. Swap the name and the order still holds. 01 ### Measure the thing you are about to lose Run 500 rows you already have through Seamless.AI and record the match rate, the fields that came back populated and the cost. Without that number a migration cannot be judged, because every provider looks cheaper per unit than the one you are paying for today. 02 ### Check which fields change LeadMagic does not return technographics and intent and news, which Seamless.AI does. If anything downstream reads those fields, the switch changes your pipeline as well as your vendor. 03 ### Rewrite the auth and the limits, in that order Seamless.AI authenticates with an API key in the Token header, created under Settings, Public API; OAuth 2.0 Bearer tokens for apps acting for many users. LeadMagic uses an API key in the X-API-Key header. The limits are the part that bites later. Seamless.AI's limits: 60 requests a minute per endpoint, shared by every key and user in the organization, with X-RateLimit headers and a 429 on excess. LeadMagic's limits: 600 req/min on Email Finder and Validation, every plan. Unmetered search API at 5 or 10 req/s on Professional and Ultimate. A loop tuned to the first will either crawl or get throttled on the second. 04 ### Run both for one billing cycle Keep the old key live and route a slice of real traffic to the new one. A month is the shortest honest test, because credit expiry, rollover and the overage rate only show up at renewal and those are where the surprises live. 05 ### Cancel on the renewal date Credits on most of these plans do not survive a downgrade. Check what happens to the balance you have already paid for, and time the switch so you are not buying the same records twice. The step people skip is the first one, and it is the only one that cannot be done after the fact. Once the old key is off you have nothing to compare the new match rate against, so a provider that is quietly worse on your segment looks like a provider that is fine. What practitioners say ## What practitioners say about Apollo The one part of this page that is not a vendor claim. The comment below makes its point in crude words, so we summarize it in our own words and link the thread. A Reddit claim is a signal rather than a fact, so nothing here is the only source for a figure on this page. ### The rate limit, not the credit price, is what people actually hit **In our words:** A practitioner building on the API says the rate limits are what their team hit, that they got past them by routing requests across three Apollo accounts, and that Apollo charges per request even when a lookup returns nothing. [r/gtmengineering](https://www.reddit.com/r/gtmengineering/comments/1toiu1u/apollo_api_limits/) · May 2026 · summarized rather than quoted Two halves worth separating. The limit is real and it is on this page: 200 requests a minute, 400 an hour and 2,000 a day on Basic, with enrichment on a separate 1,000 a minute and no hourly or daily cap. That split is why a bulk job and a per-row loop feel like different products. The charge-on-no-output half needs care, because Apollo publishes 0 credits when nothing is found and that matches what we read. What a miss does spend is a request against the rate limit, and when the limit is the binding constraint that is the cost you feel. Pooling accounts to get round a published limit is a terms question before it is an engineering one. 11 threads read on 13 October 2026, searched by vendor name. Scores and dates are the comment's own. Nothing here is the only source for a price or a limit on this site: every figure in the tables above comes from a vendor's own page. Verdict ## Should you actually switch? The short answer is at the top of this page. Before you act on it, run the test below, because it is the cheapest way to find out whether that answer holds for you. Before you migrate anything No provider in this category publishes a match rate you can hold them to, so run the same 500 rows through a free tier, a trial or a small paid top-up on each, verify every result set, and divide spend by survivors. Your own list is the only evidence worth acting on, it takes half a day, and it changes the decision often enough to be worth it. Keep going ## Head to head, and in a stack [Cognism vs Seamless.AI Compare Two quote-only databases that both charge you to search before you reveal anyone, in very different ways. Compare them →](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/compare/cognism-vs-seamless-ai) [Apollo API vs Seamless.AI Compare A published $0.0196 credit with free search and free misses, against a credit with no published price that is spent on search too. Compare them →](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/compare/apollo-vs-seamless-ai) [All alternatives 57 Every provider in the directory that teams regularly try to replace, with the reasons and the replacements for each. Browse the hub →](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/alternatives) ## Before you switch, *try the waterfall in Clay.* Clay runs a waterfall across 150+ data providers from one table, without a separate contract with each. A lookup that finds nothing costs no data credit, and the free plan includes 500 actions a month. [Try Clay](https://go.frontal.so/clay) [See all alternatives](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/alternatives) Frontal is a Clay Elite Studio Partner. FAQ ## Switching from Seamless.AI, answered **What is the best Seamless.AI alternative?** It depends on why you are leaving, which is how this page is organized rather than ranked. The first pick here is LeadMagic, which this directory lists as the best priced per operation, at $99/mo. The case for it, and what you give up, is in the section above. **Is there a free alternative to Seamless.AI?** Yes, 2 of the replacements here do. Apollo: Free plan with API access, 900 credits per seat per year granted monthly, so 75 a month. Lusha: Free plan, 40 credits a month, 1 seat, no card. API is rate limited strictly. **How were these alternatives chosen?** By the reason teams leave, not by a score. The page opens with the reasons teams leave and matches a replacement to each one. Published by ## [Frontal](https://frontal.so/) Frontal is the go-to-market partner for B2B tech companies past product-market fit. It publishes this directory. Every price, tier requirement and rate limit on this page was read from the vendor's own pricing page, developer documentation or knowledge base on the date below. Nothing on it is restated from a press release or a third-party listing. Where a vendor publishes no public figure, this page says so rather than estimating. [How we checked](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis#method). Reviewed by [Kenny Damian](https://www.linkedin.com/in/kenny-damian-90aba221a/) Co-founder & Head of GTM, Frontal **Verified** 24 Oct 2026 **Sources** 22 vendor documents Read from - [seamless.ai/pricing](https://seamless.ai/pricing) - [seamless.ai/products](https://seamless.ai/products/api) - [seamless.ai/customers](https://seamless.ai/customers/education/articles/seamless-ai-credit-and-license-types) - [seamless.ai/customers/education](https://seamless.ai/customers/education/articles/credit-back-protection) - [docs.seamless.ai/rate-limits-and-credits](https://docs.seamless.ai/rate-limits-and-credits) - [docs.seamless.ai/api-catalog](https://docs.seamless.ai/api-catalog/agent-quickstart) - [docs.seamless.ai/api-catalog/mcp](https://docs.seamless.ai/api-catalog/mcp) - [docs.seamless.ai/mcp](https://docs.seamless.ai/mcp/access-control) - [leadmagic.io/pricing](https://leadmagic.io/pricing) - [leadmagic.io/docs](https://leadmagic.io/docs/v1/introduction) - [leadmagic.io/llms.txt](https://leadmagic.io/llms.txt) - [apollo.io/pricing](https://www.apollo.io/pricing) - [docs.apollo.io/docs](https://docs.apollo.io/docs/build-with-apollo) - [docs.apollo.io/docs/rate-limits](https://docs.apollo.io/docs/rate-limits) - [docs.apollo.io/docs/create-api-key](https://docs.apollo.io/docs/create-api-key) - [docs.apollo.io/reference](https://docs.apollo.io/reference/rate-limits) - [lusha.com/pricing](https://www.lusha.com/pricing/) - [docs.lusha.com/apis](https://docs.lusha.com/apis) - [rocketreach.co/pricing](https://rocketreach.co/pricing) - [docs.rocketreach.co/reference](https://docs.rocketreach.co/reference) - [docs.rocketreach.co/reference/rate-limits](https://docs.rocketreach.co/reference/rate-limits) - [docs.rocketreach.co/reference/mcp](https://docs.rocketreach.co/reference/mcp)