--- title: "Kaspr alternatives, by reason for leaving" description: "Kaspr alternatives ranked by why teams actually switch, with verified pricing and the trade each one makes." url: https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/alternatives/kaspr-alternatives updated: 2026-11-12 --- Alternatives · Verified 24 Oct 2026 # Kaspr alternatives, sorted by *why you are leaving* Kaspr's API allows 20 requests an hour on Starter. Most teams weighing Kaspr competitors have outgrown the extension and found that the API was never built for a pipeline. 4 replacements below, each one matched to a specific reason. Short answer If you need the API to run unattended, Apollo allows 200 requests a minute and 400 an hour on Basic with a free plan to test on, and Wiza 15 a second with no subscription at all. If phones are the point, Wiza's $0.125 a mobile undercuts Kaspr's add-on credits. If you want email and phone on one export with published limits and an MCP server, RocketReach is the like-for-like move, and Lusha is the self-serve option with the API on every plan. Prices and limits for every option below are read off the vendor's own page. These are the Kaspr competitors that each answer a named problem. See the 4 alternatives [Visit Kaspr](https://www.kaspr.io/) replacements.txt 4 picks apollo **$49/seat/mo** wiza **$50 one-time** rocketreach **$33/mo annual** lusha **$37.45/mo annual** Currently on $49/user/mo annual Diagnose first ## The 3 reasons people actually leave If none of these is your situation, the honest answer is that you should probably stay. The 23 providers in the [Enrichment APIs](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis) listing are where these replacements come from. ### 1 · The API is capped by the hour Kaspr's Starter plan allows 20 API requests an hour and 250 a day; Business allows 250 an hour and 500 a day. Only Enterprise is unlimited. A backfill of 10,000 LinkedIn profiles takes 20 days on Business before credits enter into it. ### 2 · Every call spends an export credit as well Paid plans advertise unlimited B2B email credits, but each successful API call also costs one export credit, and Starter carries 12,000 exports a year. A request for the same contact twice is charged twice. In practice the email allowance is the export allowance. ### 3 · On request, and standard URLs only API access is enabled on request rather than issued with the plan, and there is none on the Free plan. The API takes standard LinkedIn profile URLs only: Sales Navigator data is available in the Chrome extension and nowhere else. The alternatives ## 4 Kaspr alternatives, and what each one fixes Ordered by how closely each one answers the reasons above, not by price. | Provider | Entry price | Unit cost | Free tier | Best for | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [Kaspr](https://www.kaspr.io/) | $49/user/mo annual | $0.049 per export, Starter annual | Free plan with 15 B2B email, 5 phone and 5 direct email credits a month, but no API access. | Baseline | | [Apollo API](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/apollo-api-review) | $49/seat/mo | $0.0196 per credit | Free plan with API access, 900 credits per seat per year granted monthly, so 75 a month | Best all-in-one GTM API | | [Wiza](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/wiza-api-review) | $50 one-time | $0.05 per email, 2 credits | Free seat plan with 20 valid emails and 5 phone numbers in the app. The API needs purchased credits; trial credits are on request. | LinkedIn URLs in, verified emails and mobiles out, paid per hit | | [RocketReach](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/rocketreach-api-review) | $33/mo annual | $0.25 per export on Pro, the first plan with phones | A free account gets 5 lookups, no card. No ongoing free tier. | API and MCP on the cheapest paid tier | | [Lusha](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/lusha-api-review) | $37.45/mo annual | $0.087 per credit | Free plan, 40 credits a month, 1 seat, no card. API is rate limited strictly. | Best published credit costs for contact data | Read from each vendor's own pricing page on 24 October 2026. In detail ## The case for each one Each one below is matched to a reason rather than scored, and each one names what you give up by taking it. A replacement with no downside is a replacement nobody has actually run. ### [Visit Apollo](https://go.frontal.so/apollo) Apollo API 200 requests a minute and 400 an hour on Basic, enrichment at 1,000 a minute, and the API on the free plan. The swap when the problem is throughput. The difference is three orders of magnitude. Kaspr Business allows 250 API requests an hour; [Apollo](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/apollo-api-review) Basic allows 200 a minute, 400 an hour and 2,000 a day, and its enrichment endpoint 1,000 a minute with no hourly or daily cap. A backfill that takes Kaspr weeks is an afternoon here. An email credit works out at $0.0196 on Basic, where Apollo grants 30,000 credits a seat a year at $49 a seat a month billed annually. Kaspr's Starter export works out at about $0.049, so Apollo is cheaper per email as well as faster. The free plan includes API access, with 900 credits a seat a year granted monthly, which is enough to measure your match rate before paying anything. Kaspr's Free plan carries no API, so that test is impossible there. #### What you give up The extension-first workflow and cheap included phones. Apollo spends 9 credits on a mobile, about $0.176, and Kaspr Starter includes 100 phone credits a month in the seat price. You also give up Kaspr's Sales Navigator support in the browser, which Apollo's API does not replace. #### When it is the wrong answer A recruiter or rep who lives in LinkedIn and wants phone numbers on the profile they are looking at. That is Kaspr's product, and an API with a higher ceiling does not improve it. [Read the review](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/apollo-api-review) ### Wiza LinkedIn URLs in, including Sales Navigator and Recruiter ones, at 15 requests a second, and no subscription needed to buy API credits. [Wiza](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/wiza-api-review) is the closest match to what Kaspr does, a LinkedIn profile in and a verified email and mobile out, with the API built for volume. Individual Reveal accepts 15 requests a second and runs 5 at once on the Starter API tier, against Kaspr Starter's 20 requests an hour. It also accepts the input Kaspr's API refuses. Wiza takes Sales Navigator and Recruiter profile URLs as well as standard ones, so a list exported from Sales Navigator does not need to be converted first. Pricing is a prepaid wallet rather than a seat: $0.025 a credit, 2,000 minimum for $50, with 2 credits for a verified email and 5 for a phone. A mobile is $0.125, under Kaspr's cheapest add-on phone credit, and a miss costs nothing. #### What you give up Unlimited emails in the app. Wiza's API charges $0.05 per found email with no allowance behind it, and its seat plans, which do carry unlimited reveals, do not include the API. Kaspr's Starter plan, at about $0.049 an export, is level on email. #### When it is the wrong answer A team that only wants emails and already pays for Kaspr seats. On email alone the two cost about the same, so moving only buys throughput, which a low-volume team does not need. [Read the review](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/wiza-api-review) ### RocketReach API and MCP access on every paid tier, published per-plan limits, and email and phone on one export from the Pro plan. [RocketReach](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/rocketreach-api-review) is the like-for-like move with the limits written down. Essentials allows 15 person lookups a minute and 500 a day, rising to 100 a minute and 3,000 a day on Ultimate. API and MCP access come with every paid plan, with no request to enable them. A person lookup takes a LinkedIn URL, an email, or a name and employer, and a lookup that finds neither an email nor a phone is refunded. The [MCP server](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/mcp-servers) at mcp.rocketreach.co/mcp signs in with OAuth. The price per export falls with volume, from about $0.33 on Essentials to $0.25 on Pro and $0.085 on Ultimate. Exports are annual allowances: 1,200 a year on Essentials, 3,600 on Pro and 20,000 on Ultimate. #### What you give up Email at Kaspr's price. RocketReach's cheapest export is dearer than Kaspr's on Starter, and Essentials is email only, so phones start at Pro for $899 a year. Its coverage is strongest in North America, so test a European list before moving it. #### When it is the wrong answer An email-led team at modest volume. The reason to move is phones and personal emails on one export with a real API, and below Ultimate the per-export price is higher than what Kaspr charges. [Read the review](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/rocketreach-api-review) ### Lusha A self-serve API on every plan, including free, with an MCP server and a flat per-credit price. The option that needs no request to switch on. [Lusha](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/lusha-api-review) publishes what each operation costs to the credit: an email is 1 and a phone number 5, at about $0.087 a credit on Pro. The API is on every plan including Free, strictly rate limited below Pro, so a developer can test it the day they sign up. Pro, at $52.45 a month billed yearly for 7,200 credits a year, is where the API stops being throttled and where webhooks and CSV enrichment arrive. Lusha also runs an MCP server, which Kaspr does not. The limits are the weak point. Lusha applies them per minute, per hour and per day, reports them in response headers, and does not publish the numbers, so your plan's ceiling is an account manager conversation. #### What you give up Cheap phones and unlimited email. A Lusha phone number is 5 credits, about $0.44, above every Kaspr add-on phone price, and there is no unlimited email allowance. Annual plans have no rollover. #### When it is the wrong answer A phone-heavy team watching unit cost. Lusha buys a self-serve, unthrottled API, not a cheaper mobile, and at $0.44 a phone the bill rises with every number you dial. [Read the review](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/lusha-api-review) Plan by plan ## What you would actually pay, on each one Every provider on this page publishes a rate card, so the real numbers can sit next to each other rather than behind a summary. The plan you want is the one whose included volume covers a normal month for you, not the cheapest one on the page. ### Kaspr Kaspr publishes 4 tiers, one of them free, and the paid ladder runs from $49 to $79, with a quoted tier above it. #### Free $0 /mo, 1 user - 15 B2B email, 5 phone and 5 direct email credits a month - 100 exports - No API access #### Starter $49 /user/mo billed annually, or $65 monthly - Unlimited B2B email credits, 1,200 phone and 60 direct email credits a year - 12,000 exports a year, one spent per successful API call - Limited API on request: 20 requests an hour, 250 a day #### Business $79 /user/mo billed annually, or $99 monthly - Unlimited B2B email credits, 2,400 phone and 2,400 direct email credits a year - 30,000 exports a year - API on request: 250 requests an hour, 500 a day #### Enterprise Custom for bigger teams - Unlimited email and phone credits - Unlimited API requests - Intent data and SSO ### [Visit Apollo](https://go.frontal.so/apollo) Apollo API Apollo publishes 4 tiers, one of them free, and the paid ladder runs from $49 to $119. #### Free $0 900 credits a seat a year - Full API access, not a trial of it - Granted monthly, so 75 credits a month in practice - 2 sequences and basic filters #### Basic $49 /seat/mo billed annually, 30,000 credits a seat a year - $588 a seat a year, credits granted upfront and pooled across the team - 2,500 credits a month, at $0.0196 each - Annual billing saves 24% against paying monthly #### Professional $79 /seat/mo billed annually, 48,000 credits a seat a year - 4,000 credits a month, at $0.0198 each - AI lead scoring and multi-touch outreach #### Organization $119 /seat/mo billed annually, minimum 3 seats - 72,000 credits a seat a year, so 6,000 a month - $0.0198 a credit, so the rate is flat across every paid tier - The three-seat minimum makes $357 a month the real floor ### Wiza Wiza publishes 4 tiers, none of them free, and the paid ladder runs from $49 to $199, with a quoted tier above it. #### API credits $50 one-time, 2,000 credits - $0.025 a credit, no API plan required - About 1,000 verified emails or 400 phones - Bought from a slider in Settings, API #### API credits, larger $5,000 one-time, 200,000 credits - The same $0.025 a credit - Wiza's own worked example, not a discount tier - About 100,000 verified emails #### Enterprise API Custom contact sales - Larger credit plans with volume discounts - 15 or more reveals running at once - Trial credits for a proof of concept, on request #### Seat plans $49 to $199 /user/mo, monthly billing - Starter, Email and Email + Phone - $0.15 an extra email, $0.35 an extra phone - No API access listed on any of them ### RocketReach RocketReach publishes 3 tiers, none of them free, and the paid ladder runs from $33 to $141.58. #### Essentials $33 /mo billed annually, $399 a year - 1,200 exports a year, email only - Unlimited verified personal and professional emails - MCP and API access #### Pro $75 /mo billed annually, $899 a year - 3,600 exports a year, email and phone - Technographics, news and org charts - Salesforce, Outreach, HubSpot and Salesloft integrations #### Ultimate $141.58 /mo billed annually, $1,699 a year - 20,000 exports a year, email and phone - Intent data and healthcare data - Salesforce custom mapping ### Lusha Lusha publishes 5 tiers, one of them free, and the paid ladder runs from $37.45 to $299.95, with a quoted tier above it. #### Free $0 /month - 40 credits a month, 1 seat - No credit card required - API access, but strictly rate limited #### Starter $37.45 /mo billed yearly - 4,800 credits a year, granted up front - 1 seat. Works out at $0.094 a credit - API still strictly rate limited #### Pro $52.45 /mo billed yearly - 7,200 credits a year, at $0.087 each - 2 free seats, full API, webhooks, CSV enrichment - Credits roll over to twice the monthly cap #### Premium $299.95 /mo billed yearly - 40,800 credits a year, at $0.088 each - 5 free seats, API Advanced, team management - Credit allocation across the team #### Scale Quote only - Custom annual credit volume - SSO and a dedicated customer success team - No rollover: the cap does not apply Read the included volume before the headline price. A plan that costs twice as much and carries five times the credits is the cheaper plan, and on this page that is the usual case rather than the exception. Cost model ## What each one costs at your volume Kaspr first, then every replacement. The model picks the cheapest published plan that covers your volume on each one, which is the comparison a row of entry prices cannot make. ### Kaspr Priced on the volume you use, so the plan that covers a normal month is the one that decides the bill. Plan that covers it **Past the published ladder** Largest published **Business, 2,500 exports** At your volume **Quoted** Ask for **the per-export rate above 2,500** ### [Visit Apollo](https://go.frontal.so/apollo) Apollo API Priced on the volume you use, so the plan that covers a normal month is the one that decides the bill. Plan that covers it **Basic, 4 seats** Monthly **$196** Twelve months **$2,352** Included **10,000 credits** Your rate at this volume **$0.0196 per credit** ### Wiza Priced on the volume you use, so the plan that covers a normal month is the one that decides the bill. Plan that covers it **API credits, packs bought as needed** Monthly **$500** Twelve months **$6,000** Included **2,000 credits a pack, then $0.025 each** Your rate at this volume **$0.05 per email** ### RocketReach Priced on the volume you use, so the plan that covers a normal month is the one that decides the bill. Plan that covers it **Past the published ladder** Largest published **Ultimate, 1,667 exports** At your volume **Quoted** Ask for **the per-export rate above 1,667** ### Lusha Priced on the volume you use, so the plan that covers a normal month is the one that decides the bill. Plan that covers it **Past the published ladder** Largest published **Premium, 3,400 credits** At your volume **Quoted** Ask for **the per-credit rate above 3,400** Plans are read from each vendor's own pricing page and the model picks the cheapest one that covers you, so these are list prices on the billing term each vendor publishes, annual where that is how it prices, before any discount you negotiate. Twelve months ## What a year costs at three volumes The same plan-fit arithmetic as the model above, run out to a year, because an annual number is what a budget actually asks for. Every column moves with volume, through a bigger plan or more seats. | A year at | Kaspr | Apollo API | Wiza | RocketReach | Lusha | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1,000 a month | $588 Starter | $588 Basic | $600 API credits | $1,699 Ultimate | $3,599 Premium | | 10,000 a month | Quoted | $2,352 Basic | $6,000 API credits | Quoted | Quoted | | 50,000 a month | Quoted | $11,760 Basic | $30,000 API credits | Quoted | Quoted | These are list prices on the published plan that covers each volume, on the billing term each vendor publishes, so they are the number before you negotiate. Decide ## Which replacement is yours Answer what matters most and the lean appears below. Every option is read from the records on this page, and staying on Kaspr is one of the possible answers. What matters most on the thing you are replacing? Have you measured what you have today? Answer the questions above Each answer leans one way. The recommendation appears here once you have picked at least two. A tool like this can only weigh what is on the page. It does not know your workload, and the one test that does is the bake-off on this page: your own rows, queries or records, run on the cheapest entry each side offers. Where an answer leans on a certification or an integration, it means that vendor publishes it on the pages this directory read, which is not the same as the other one lacking it. The sources are listed at the foot of the page. Provenance ## Where the data comes from, and what you may do with it The question that arrives late and expensively is who is allowed to hold the data. A migration is the moment to check it, because you are signing a new contract anyway. | Provider | Fields returned | Coverage | Compliance | Redistribution | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [Kaspr](https://www.kaspr.io/) | Work email, Personal email, Mobile phone, LinkedIn profile, Firmographics | Global | GDPR CCPA | Not stated | | [Apollo API](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/apollo-api-review) | Work email, Mobile phone, Firmographics, Technographics, Job postings, Intent and news, LinkedIn profile, CRM records | Global | GDPR DPA SOC 2 Type II CCPA | Not stated | | [Wiza](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/wiza-api-review) | Work email, Personal email, Mobile phone, LinkedIn profile, Firmographics | Global | None published | Not stated | | [RocketReach](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/rocketreach-api-review) | Work email, Personal email, Mobile phone, Firmographics, Technographics, Intent and news | Strongest in NA | CCPA | Not stated | | [Lusha](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/enrichment-apis/lusha-api-review) | Work email, Mobile phone, Firmographics, Technographics, Intent and news, Job changes | Global | GDPR DPA CCPA | Not stated | None of these states a redistribution position on its pricing or docs pages. Internally that never matters. Put the rows in something your customers can see and it becomes the question your legal team asks first. Two practical notes that apply to every provider on this page. A compliance badge describes the vendor rather than your use of it, so a GDPR DPA does not give you a lawful basis for the outreach you send. And every one of these vendors runs its own opt-out, which means a person who asks you to delete their record has to be removed from your copy as well as from theirs. Migration ## Moving off Kaspr Written against Apollo API, the first pick above, because the steps are the same whichever one you take and the specifics are what make them useful. Swap the name and the order still holds. 01 ### Measure the thing you are about to lose Run 500 rows you already have through Kaspr and record the match rate, the fields that came back populated and the cost. Without that number a migration cannot be judged, because every provider looks cheaper per unit than the one you are paying for today. 02 ### Check which fields change Apollo does not return personal email, which Kaspr does. If anything downstream reads that field, the switch changes your pipeline as well as your vendor. 03 ### Rewrite the auth and the limits, in that order Kaspr authenticates with an API key from the API page of the Kaspr app settings, sent in the Authorization header; API access is enabled on request. Apollo uses an API key in the x-api-key header. The limits are the part that bites later. Kaspr's limits: per hour and per day by plan: 20 an hour and 250 a day on Starter, 250 an hour and 500 a day on Business, unlimited on Enterprise. Apollo's limits: 200 req/min, 400/hour and 2,000/day on Basic. Enrichment gets 1,000/min with no hourly or daily cap. A loop tuned to the first will either crawl or get throttled on the second. 04 ### Run both for one billing cycle Keep the old key live and route a slice of real traffic to the new one. A month is the shortest honest test, because credit expiry, rollover and the overage rate only show up at renewal and those are where the surprises live. 05 ### Cancel on the renewal date Credits on most of these plans do not survive a downgrade. Check what happens to the balance you have already paid for, and time the switch so you are not buying the same records twice. The step people skip is the first one, and it is the only one that cannot be done after the fact. Once the old key is off you have nothing to compare the new match rate against, so a provider that is quietly worse on your segment looks like a provider that is fine. What practitioners say ## What practitioners say about Apollo The one part of this page that is not a vendor claim. The comment below makes its point in crude words, so we summarize it in our own words and link the thread. A Reddit claim is a signal rather than a fact, so nothing here is the only source for a figure on this page. ### The rate limit, not the credit price, is what people actually hit **In our words:** A practitioner building on the API says the rate limits are what their team hit, that they got past them by routing requests across three Apollo accounts, and that Apollo charges per request even when a lookup returns nothing. [r/gtmengineering](https://www.reddit.com/r/gtmengineering/comments/1toiu1u/apollo_api_limits/) · May 2026 · summarized rather than quoted Two halves worth separating. The limit is real and it is on this page: 200 requests a minute, 400 an hour and 2,000 a day on Basic, with enrichment on a separate 1,000 a minute and no hourly or daily cap. That split is why a bulk job and a per-row loop feel like different products. The charge-on-no-output half needs care, because Apollo publishes 0 credits when nothing is found and that matches what we read. What a miss does spend is a request against the rate limit, and when the limit is the binding constraint that is the cost you feel. Pooling accounts to get round a published limit is a terms question before it is an engineering one. 11 threads read on 13 October 2026, searched by vendor name. Scores and dates are the comment's own. Nothing here is the only source for a price or a limit on this site: every figure in the tables above comes from a vendor's own page. Verdict ## Should you actually switch? The short answer is at the top of this page. Before you act on it, run the test below, because it is the cheapest way to find out whether that answer holds for you. Before you migrate anything No provider in this category publishes a match rate you can hold them to, so run the same 500 rows through a free tier, a trial or a small paid top-up on each, verify every result set, and divide spend by survivors. Your own list is the only evidence worth acting on, it takes half a day, and it changes the decision often enough to be worth it. Keep going ## Head to head, and in a stack [All alternatives 57 Every provider in the directory that teams regularly try to replace, with the reasons and the replacements for each. Browse the hub →](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/alternatives) ## Before you switch, *try the waterfall in Clay.* Clay runs a waterfall across 150+ data providers from one table, without a separate contract with each. A lookup that finds nothing costs no data credit, and the free plan includes 500 actions a month. [Try Clay](https://go.frontal.so/clay) [See all alternatives](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis/alternatives) Frontal is a Clay Elite Studio Partner. FAQ ## Switching from Kaspr, answered **What is the best Kaspr alternative?** It depends on why you are leaving, which is how this page is organized rather than ranked. The first pick here is Apollo, which this directory lists as the best all-in-one GTM API, at $49/seat/mo. The case for it, and what you give up, is in the section above. **Is there a free alternative to Kaspr?** Yes, 2 of the replacements here do. Apollo: Free plan with API access, 900 credits per seat per year granted monthly, so 75 a month. Lusha: Free plan, 40 credits a month, 1 seat, no card. API is rate limited strictly. **How were these alternatives chosen?** By the reason teams leave, not by a score. The page opens with the reasons teams leave and matches a replacement to each one. Published by ## [Frontal](https://frontal.so/) Frontal is the go-to-market partner for B2B tech companies past product-market fit. It publishes this directory. Every price, tier requirement and rate limit on this page was read from the vendor's own pricing page, developer documentation or knowledge base on the date below. Nothing on it is restated from a press release or a third-party listing. Where a vendor publishes no public figure, this page says so rather than estimating. [How we checked](https://frontal.so/gtm-apis#method). Reviewed by [Kenny Damian](https://www.linkedin.com/in/kenny-damian-90aba221a/) Co-founder & Head of GTM, Frontal **Verified** 24 Oct 2026 **Sources** 22 vendor documents Read from - [kaspr.io/pricing](https://www.kaspr.io/pricing) - [kaspr.io/api](https://www.kaspr.io/api) - [help.kaspr.io/en](https://help.kaspr.io/en/articles/8857583-how-to-setup-kaspr-api) - [apollo.io/pricing](https://www.apollo.io/pricing) - [docs.apollo.io/docs](https://docs.apollo.io/docs/build-with-apollo) - [docs.apollo.io/docs/rate-limits](https://docs.apollo.io/docs/rate-limits) - [docs.apollo.io/docs/create-api-key](https://docs.apollo.io/docs/create-api-key) - [docs.apollo.io/reference](https://docs.apollo.io/reference/rate-limits) - [wiza.co/pricing](https://wiza.co/pricing) - [wiza.co/wiza-api](https://wiza.co/wiza-api) - [docs.wiza.co](https://docs.wiza.co/) - [docs.wiza.co/overview](https://docs.wiza.co/overview/usage-limits) - [docs.wiza.co/using-the-api](https://docs.wiza.co/using-the-api/credit-deduction-behavior) - [help.wiza.co/en](https://help.wiza.co/en/articles/13551713-how-to-purchase-api-credits) - [help.wiza.co/en/articles](https://help.wiza.co/en/articles/12325950-wiza-api-rate-limits) - [help.wiza.co/en/articles/14115896-wiza-api-everything-you-need-to-know](https://help.wiza.co/en/articles/14115896-wiza-api-everything-you-need-to-know) - [rocketreach.co/pricing](https://rocketreach.co/pricing) - [docs.rocketreach.co/reference](https://docs.rocketreach.co/reference) - [docs.rocketreach.co/reference/rate-limits](https://docs.rocketreach.co/reference/rate-limits) - [docs.rocketreach.co/reference/mcp](https://docs.rocketreach.co/reference/mcp) - [lusha.com/pricing](https://www.lusha.com/pricing/) - [docs.lusha.com/apis](https://docs.lusha.com/apis)